Determining where we are going by evaluating where we have been…

Archive for November 9th, 2009


Fooling history

If you are anything like me, you stared at the Health Care vote numbers on C-Span (because nobody could have sat through Geraldo on Fox) and wondered, why in the world is that ‘1′ under Republican and ‘Aye”  why in the world would any Republican vote for this travesty of a bill?

Well, the answer seems to be that President Obama and the White House put a full court press on Congressman Anh Cao similar to the one that they had utilized successfully on Senator Snowe.   According to Cao he had several meetings with President Obama and White House staff in the weeks leading up to the vote.

Cao was the only Republican to back the House bill Saturday night. He told Fox News that he bucked his party out of a sense of obligation for his district, which encompasses most of New Orleans.

“My vote was a vote of conscience,” Cao said. “Whether or not it was a popular vote for the party is of little relevance to me.”

But Cao said the Obama administration invested considerable time in him. He said President Obama spoke with him for “a period of a couple weeks” and that Obama’s staff spoke with him “on a number of occasions.”

The final pitch came Saturday around noon, when Obama called Cao and apparently offered assurances that he would help economic recovery in his district, which is mostly minority and poor. Obama got 75 percent of the votes in Cao’s district in last November’s presidential election.

“We were able to sit down to talk about recovery, to talk about the needs of the district,” Cao told Fox News, though he said no “promises” were made. “The administration and I, we have a very great relationship.”

Okay, courting the opposing party and influencing a vote are just politics as usual, and both understandable and foregiveable.  It is not the result of the campaign, but the importance of it that I call into question.   Why can the President invest time in romancing the vote for his Health Care program, but not in devising a campaign for defeating our enemies in Afganistan?  Why is passing a Health Care bill which will supposedly not REALLY go into effect until after Obama’s next election (you have no idea how hard typing that was) more important than jobs?   It seems senseless to me.

It has been said many times that what happens to our politicians is that we send them off to Washington full of hope and promise and they quickly become part of the problem.  This happens when lobbyists and other influence peddlers flash rolls of cash or whatever in front of them.  Then they not only become corrupt, but they fall into the Washington trap of worrying 1st and foremost about their next election.

But that does not seem to be Obama’s main issue (notice I said main issue) .  Obama seems to have fallen into the 2nd trap of policticans.  Beyond worrying about their next election, politicians also worry about their ‘legacy’ and how history is going to remember them.  This seems to be the trap that Obama has fallen into, and unfortunately he has fallen into it hard and fast.  Never in my memory or my personal research of history has a president been more worried about legacy this early in his tenure.   Obama has reached a level of narcissism that is above and beyond any “Imperial Presidency” of the past.

You could be forgiven for assuming that President Obama skipped the Berlin Wall ceremony as he and his staff could not think of a way to 1) Get out of praising Reagan (although the left wing media has done a pretty good job of it) and 2) Made it all about him, which he seems to manage about everything else.

But I don’t think we see the real picture of the President’s agenda by what he doesn’t do but by observing what he does do, and therby shows as important to him.

Take the seduction of Cao and Snowe, Obama had plenty of time for that, and for what?  To obtain a grand total of ‘1′ Republican vote in the Senate and ‘1′ in the House?  That was really worth all that time and effort?  How?  Even if you agree with the rather fuzzy math that the administration uses to describe the fate of those who lack health insurance (11,000 – 18,000 deaths per year) how does this daleance with two Republican party members (RINOS or not) save so much as one life?    So rather than work on getting American’s jobs, or defeating our enemies it was more important to devote time, energy and resources to achieve a meaningless vote on a pet bill so that Robert Gibbs could claim that it was a bi-partisan bill?  Shame on you Mr. President, who is this supposed to fool, Posterity?

Anybody but Boxer

I initially started this column just to highlight next years race between the former head of Hewlett Packard Carly Fiorina and Barbara (call me Senator) Boxer.  Then I got wrapped up in the latest Barbara catastrophy, the climate change bill and her efforts to ram it through the senate.  If you thought that the health care bill was bad, wait until you get a peek at this 900 page monstrosity. Just the fact that it is being sponsored by Barbara Boxer and John Kerry should scare you to death!

Barbara, is keeping with the Obama administrations policy of doing everything except that which is crucial (like Afganistan, jobs, etc.) as quickly as possible because otherwise we will not have a shiny new Climate change bill to impress all of the world with in Copenhagen this December.   Boxer has already ramrodded this bill through commitee (with NO Republican support) and is determined that it get in front of the Senate as quickly as possible.

Today, Kerry reminded Republicans that 2008 Republican presidential nominee Senator John McCain called for strong, mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions, and that Senator Graham has joined Democrats in this year’s fight. “We can rediscover bi-partisan progress once again,” he said.

Wow, so Senator Graham and John McCain both like it?  Can we vote for it right now?  Please, that is like Barbara Boxer’s famous you-tube video where she admonishes the leader of the Black Chamber of Commerce that another black man likes the health care bill, so why doesn’t he?  {Note:  If a Republican said something this stupid, he/she would be villified on every leftist media source possible, which is quite a few media sources}

Kerry continued “Chairman Boxer and I are determined to see this Congress pass a strong climate bill for the President to sign,” said Kerry. “This is and has always been a big lift, but heading into Copenhagen, we have momentum on our side.”

Environmentalists are pleased with the bill’s advancement. Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said, “This clears the way for full Senate action on clean energy and climate legislation that will put Americans back to work, reduce our reliance on foreign oil and create a healthier future for our children. Americans are united around these goals. It’s time for the full Senate to act.”

Now one of the other big buttons that the left is going to keep pushing is the “Green Jobs Button”, because most Americans are not really going to give a rat’s ass about impressing people in Copenhagen, but before you jump on the “Green Jobs” bandwagon, look at the bill a little closer.  Two of the organizations that stand to benifit (and actually the only ones that I know of) from the Green Jobs bonanza are Blue Green Alliance a national partnership of labor unions and environmental organizations dedicated to expanding the number and quality of jobs in the green economy. With partners USW, Sierra Club, CWA, NRDC, LIUNA, SEIU, AFT and UWUA, the Blue Green Alliance is uniting eight million people in pursuit of good jobs, a clean environment and a green economy. Yes, you read it right, SEIU.

The other organization is Green for all, the Green for All Academy (according to it’s website) does four primary things:

  • identifies, recruits and trains leaders from low-income communities and communities of color across the United States to deliver, in their own voices, key “green jobs” messages about the opportunity of a clean energy economy and the importance of climate protection;
  • develops materials, tools and trainings that inspire people to join the movement for an inclusive green economy;
  • supports our leaders as they spread this message in their communities by holding regular conference calls, hosting an online community, delivering powerful tools (e.g., reports, videos, curricula) to help them lead their communities, and placing them in leadership positions in local and national conferences and other fora; and
  • helps leaders organize members of their communities to influence public opinion and public policy, and support green economy solutions.

Does any of this sound familiar??

Well, where as Blue Green Alliance is associated with SEIU, Green For All is associated with the Apollo Alliance  you know, the ones associated with ACORN?  Our country is being taken over by Community Organizers.

More on this story later, if you want to read more on the subject, check out the websites below:

http://www.seiu.org/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&tag=Blue%20Green%20Alliance&limit=20

http://www.bioneers.org/conference/sessions-events/energy-action-coalition-and-green-for-all-green-collar-jobs-advocacy-and-impleme